Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers - Outcome of the European Parliament's first reading (Strasbourg, 13 to 16 December 2010)

Inhoud

Delen

enveloppe
  1. Tekst
  2. Originele weergave
  1. Meer informatie

1.

Tekst

COUNCIL OFBrussels, 22 December 2010 THE EUROPEAN UNION 18097/10 Interinstitutional File:

2010/0051 (COD) CODEC 1561 INST 610 PE 574 NOTE from: General Secretariat to: Permanent Representatives Committee/Council Subject: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers

  • - 
    Outcome of the European Parliament's first reading

(Strasbourg, 13 to 16 December 2010)

I. INTRODUCTION

In accordance with the provisions of Article 294 of the TFEU Treaty and the joint declaration on practical arrangements for the codecision procedure [[note: 1]], a number of informal contacts took place between the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission with a view to reaching an agreement on this dossier at first reading, thereby avoiding the need for a second reading and conciliation. [[note: 1]] OJ C 145, 30.6.2007, p.5.

In this context, the Rapporteur, Mr József SZÁJER (EPP - HU), presented 28 compromise amendments to the proposal for a Regulation, on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs. These amendments had been agreed during the informal contacts referred to above.

In addition, Mr Paolo DE CASTRO (S&D - IT) and other MEPs tabled two amendments and the S&D political group tabled one amendment. II. DEBATE

The Rapporteur opened the debate, which took place on 15 December 2010, and:

· welcomed the prospect of an agreement in first reading;

· noted that, even in the case of implementing acts, the Parliament had obtained and kept the right

of scrutiny; and

· stated that he expected statements from the Commission which would make clear its commitment regarding the alignment of the remaining part of the acquis communautaire.

Commissioner SEFCOVIC

· noted that under the new system the Commission would still submit draft measures to committees composed of representatives from the Member States, but that - contrary to the current system - there will be no scope for intervention by the Council as such. As the new treaty makes clear, only Member States - not the Council - can control the exercise of the implementing powers by the Commission;

· stated that the Regulation provides that all special procedures will disappear and that all implementing measures including those on trade will be subject to the Regulation. This will represent a real revolution in the field of commercial policy;

· recalled the Commission's wish to simplify procedures. The Regulation will establish just two procedures (advisory and examination) instead of the current four. The Regulation will also provide for an automatic adaptation of the existing comitology procedures. The new procedures will apply to all existing legislation from day one;

· noted that the Commission had committed in a statement to review all the acquis in order to adapt it as far as legally required to the regime of delegated acts. The Commission understands how important this is for the Parliament. The Commission has so far identified 153 acts which were not submitted to codecision before the Lisbon Treaty, and which confer powers on the Commission that have to be turned into delegated powers. In addition there are 299 acts which were previously aligned to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, which will now have to be reviewed in the light of the provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts. The Commission's aim is that, before the end of Parliament's present legislative period, all existing legislation will be fully in line with the new provision of the Lisbon Treaty. This is an ambitious objective;

· stated that the Presidency had asked him to deliver to the Parliament a statement of the Presidency. This statement notes that the Presidency is aware of and welcomes the Commission's alignment aim. The Presidency also confirms that it is willing to do its utmost to make sure that this alignment is concluded as soon as possible once proposals by the Commission have been submitted. The Presidency is ready to cooperate in a loyal manner with the Parliament and the Commission;

· noted that with just one regrettable exception the new rules will stipulate that only a qualified majority vote by the committee against the draft implementing act can prevent the Commission adopting it. The one exception, where the Commission explicitly needs a positive opinion of the committee before being authorised to adopt the draft implementing act, relates to definitive multilateral trade safeguard measures. Even though only a limited number of acts are adopted in this area, the Commission opposed this exception on institutional grounds as it would have preferred a full alignment with the new rules. The Commission was ultimately prepared to accept this exception because it was the only possible basis for the compromise agreement;

· gave assurances that the whole procedure will be conducted in complete transparency. All documents submitted to the committees would be sent simultaneously to the Parliament and to the Council. These two institutions would therefore have a right of scrutiny on a completely equal footing. Either institution can indicate to the Commission its opinion that the draft implementing act exceeds the Commission's powers;

· argued that the new text clearly strengthens the Community method and clearly expands the Parliament's power of scrutiny into all areas. For example, the new Regulation provides that in some cases the Commission might be obliged to discuss the matter in an appeal committee.

However this committee will be a normal comitology committee chaired by the Commission and subject to the same rules. Consequently, only qualified majority against the Commission's draft can then prevent the Commission from adopting it;

· stated that if the Parliament's first-reading opinion were to conform to the compromise text during the December 2010 plenary session, the new Regulation would enter into force on 1 March 2011. This would be welcome as the new legal framework has to be operating as soon as possible; and

· expressed the hope that it would in the meantime be possible to launch a common reflection process about the line of demarcation between the delegated powers and the implementing powers of the Commission. This would not only help to smooth the process of preparing new legislation, but would also streamline the alignment exercise. Speaking on behalf of the Committee on Development, Mr Gay MITCHELL (EPP - IE):

· expressed his concern that the Commission's aim is to complete the alignment exercise within three and a half years. That would be too long and was in any case a mere 'aim';

· stated that the Parliament should not be dismissed as a minor and unimportant institution. The Commission often seems to be far too close to the Council - rather than an honest broker between the Parliament and the Council. The Parliament is too easily divided and sometimes accepts the positions of the Council and the Commission far too easily; and

· argued that the Parliament should not be under any pressure to sign up completely to the compromise text. The most important thing is to secure a fair compromise that offers the most to the Parliament and to the electorate. If this means a second-reading agreement, so be it. Speaking on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, Mr Saïd EL KHADRAOUI (S&D - BE):

· stressed the importance of the Parliament receiving as much information as possible so that it can do its work well; and

· regarding the transition period, asked the Commission to respect the Parliament when it comes to transposing the acquis. Speaking on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, Mr Paolo DE CASTRO (S&D - IT):

· expressed his disappointment with the compromise agreement;

· warned that the compromise text represented a weakening of the Parliament's position regarding the scope of applicability of delegated acts;

· called for support for his amendment instituting automatic alignment; amd

· argued that there was no need to have an agreement in first reading. The Parliament has a duty to improve the text as much as it can. If this requires a second reading, so be it. Speaking on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Mr Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO (S&D - ES) welcomed the review clause which would make it possible to address any difficulties which might arise.

Speaking on behalf of the EPP political group, Mr Klaus-Heiner LEHNE (EPP - DE):

· stated that the current issue was not the demarcation line between delegated and implementing acts that matter would be determined when negotiating the particular legislative acts in question;

· argued that the solution on foreign trade was rather bureaucratic, but that it was the only politically possible solution. It would give the Parliament greater powers and go beyond the Treaty; and

· supported the compromise text in first reading because he saw no possibility of getting a better deal by passing on to second reading or even to conciliation. Speaking on behalf of the Greens/EFA political group, Mrs Eva LICHTENBERGER (Greens/EFA - AT):

· regretted the absence of many of the MEPs who had been given the opportunity to speak; and

· stated that, whilst she did not believe the compromise agreement to be perfect, she nevertheless thought that it was the best possible option and therefore gave it her support.

Mr Raffaele BALDASSARRE (EPP - IT) welcomed the prospect of an agreement in first reading and particularly welcomed the hard won compromise on common commercial policy.

Mr Gianluca SUSTA (S&D - IT):

· opposed the proposal as prejudicial to the powers of the Parliament and not in conformity with the Treaty;

· asked why a swift adoption was needed; and

· regretted the lack of a firm deadline for alignment.

Commissioner SEFCOVIC once more took the floor and:

· recalled that the Commission has 452 (299 + 153) acts to align. It is a very ambitious plan to seek to align all of these acts before the end of the current legislature;

· read out one paragraph of the draft Commission statement which makes the Commission's commitment to transparency and clarity absolutely clear:

"While this alignment exercise is under way, the Commission will keep the European Parliament regularly informed on draft implementing measures related to these instruments which should become, in the future, delegated acts."

· noted that, whilst it is currently possible for a simple majority of Member States to block a Commission proposal related to anti-dumping and countervailing measures, it will in future require a qualified majority. This will strengthen the Union approach and the position of the Commission in trade talks.

The Rapporteur once more took the floor and rejected the assertion that the Parliament was being rushed into a first-reading agreement under pressure from the Council; the reverse is in fact the case. He noted that the longer the delay in adopting the proposed Regulation, the longer the old comitology procedure (which the Parliament does not like) would continue. Nine months was not too short a period for these negotiations which were hopefully about to be concluded. There had been full transparency. He said that he himself had decided to accept an agreement, because the Parliament would be getting all it wanted. III. VOTE When it voted on 16 December 2010, the plenary adopted the Committee's 28 compromise amendments to the proposal for a Regulation. No other amendments were tabled. The amendments adopted correspond to what was agreed between the three institutions and ought therefore to be acceptable to the Council. Consequently, once the legal linguists [[note: 1]] have scrutinised the text, the Council should be in a position to adopt the legislative act.

The Parliament's legislation resolution does not set out the adopted amendments themselves.

Instead, the legislative resolution sets out the Parliament's first-reading position, which is the text of the Commission's proposal as modified by the amendments. The text of the European Parliament legislative resolution is annexed to this note. This legislative resolution contains a number of statements by the institutions.

____________________ [[note: 1]] In order to prepare for the Legal/Linguistic Experts' meeting with national experts, delegations with legal-linguistic comments may send them to the coordination secretariat of the Directorate for the Quality of Legislation (secretariat.jl-codecision@consilium.europa.eu) by 14 January 2010. ANNEX

(16.12.2010)

Control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers

***I

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 December 2010 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers (COM(2010)0083 C7-0073/2010 2010/0051(COD)) (Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2010)0083), having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 291(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7- 0073/2010), having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 1 December 2010 to approve Parliament's position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure, having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Development, the Committee on International Trade, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the Committee on Transport and Tourism, the Committee on Regional Development, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, the Committee on Fisheries, the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (A7-0355/2010),

  • 1. 
    Adopts the position at first reading hereinafter set out;
  • 2. 
    Approves the joint statement by Parliament, the Council and the Commission annexed to this resolution;
  • 3. 
    Takes note of the Commission statements annexed to this resolution;

4 Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

  • 5. 
    Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

P7_TC1-COD(2010)0051 Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 16 December 2010 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) No .../2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

; and in particular Article 291(3) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments, Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure[[note: 1]],

Whereas:

(1) Where uniform conditions for the implementation of legally binding Union acts ("basic acts")

are needed, those acts are to confer implementing powers on the Commission, or, in duly justified specific cases and in the cases provided for in Articles 24 and 26 of the Treaty on European Union, on the Council.

(2) It is for the legislator, fully respecting the criteria laid down in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to decide in each basic act to confer implementing powers on the Commission in accordance with Article 291(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

(3) In the context of the Treaty establishing the European Community, the exercise of implementing powers by the Commission was governed by Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999[[note: 2]].

(4) The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union now requires the European Parliament and the Council to lay down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers.

(5) It is necessary to ensure that procedures for such control are clear, effective and proportionate to the nature of the implementing acts and that they reflect the institutional requirements of the Treaty as well as the experience gained and the common practice followed in the implementation of Decision 1999/468/EC.

(6) In those basic acts which require the control of the Member States for the adoption by the Commission of implementing acts, it is appropriate that for the purposes of such control committees should be set up composed of the representatives of the Member States and chaired by the Commission. [[note: 1]]Position of the European Parliament of 16 December 2010. [[note: 2]]OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

(7) Where appropriate, the control mechanism should include referral to an appeal committee which should meet at the appropriate level.

(8) In order to simplify the requirements for the Commission's exercise of implementing powers, there should only be two procedures: the advisory procedure and the examination procedure.

(9) In the interests of simplification, common rules should apply to the committee, including the key provisions relating to the functioning of their proceedings and the possibility for the committee to deliver an opinion by written procedure.

(10) Criteria should be laid down to determine the procedure to be used for the adoption of implementing acts. In order to achieve greater consistency, the procedural requirements should be proportionate to the nature and impact of the implementing acts to be adopted .

(11) The examination procedure should in particular apply for the adoption of measures of general scope designed to implement basic acts and specific measures with a potentially important impact. That procedure should provide for control by the Member States in such a way that acts cannot be adopted if they are not in conformity with the opinion of the committee, except in very exceptional circumstances, where the Commission should be able, in spite of a negative opinion, to adopt and apply acts for a limited period of time. The Commission should be able to review the draft acts in the event that no opinion is delivered by the committee, taking into account the views expressed within the committee.

(12) Provided that the basic act confers implementing powers on the Commission relating to programmes with substantial budgetary implications or directed to third countries, the examination procedure should apply.

(13) The Chair of the relevant committee should endeavour to find solutions which command the widest possible support within the committee or the appeal committee and should explain the manner in which the discussions and suggestions for amendments have been taken into account. For that purpose, the Commission should pay particular attention to the views expressed within the committee or the appeal committee as regards draft definitive anti-dumping or countervailing measures.

(14) When considering the adoption of other draft implementing acts concerning particularly sensitive sectors, notably taxation, consumers' health, food safety and protection of the environment, the Commission, in order to find a balanced solution, will as far as possible act in such a way as to avoid going against any predominant position which might emerge within the appeal committee against the appropriateness of an implementing act.

(15) The advisory procedure should as a general rule apply in all other cases and where it is considered to be most appropriate.

(16) It should be possible to adopt acts which are measures which are to apply immediately on imperative grounds of urgency, where this is provided for in a basic act.

(17) The European Parliament and the Council should be promptly informed of committee proceedings on a regular basis.

(18) Either the European Parliament or the Council should be able at any time to indicate to the Commission that, in its view, a draft implementing act exceeds the implementing powers

provided for in the basic act, taking into account their rights relating to the review of the legality of Union acts.

(19) Public access to information on committee proceedings should be ensured in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents[[note: 1]].

(20) A register containing information on committee proceedings should be kept by the Commission. Consequently, rules relating to the protection of classified documents applicable to the Commission should also apply to the use of the register.

(21) Decision 1999/468/EC should be repealed. In order to ensure the transition between the regime provided for in Decision 1999/468/EC and this Regulation, any reference in existing legislation to the procedures provided for in that Decision should, with the exception of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a thereof, be understood as a reference to the corresponding procedures provided for in this Regulation. The effects of Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC should be provisionally maintained for the purposes of existing basic acts which refer to that Article.

(22) The Commission's powers, as laid down by the Treaty, concerning the implementation of the competition rules are not affected by this Regulation, HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 Subject-matter This Regulation lays down the rules and general principles governing the mechanisms which apply in cases where a legally binding Union act (hereinafter a "basic act") identifies the need for uniform conditions of implementation and consequently requires that the adoption of implementing acts by the Commission be subject to the control of Member States.

Article 2 Selection of procedures

  • 1. 
    A basic act may provide for the application of the advisory procedure or the examination

procedure, taking into account the nature or the impact of the implementing acts required.

  • 2. 
    The examination procedure applies, in particular, for the adoption of:

(a) implementing acts of general scope;

(b) other implementing acts relating to:

(i) programmes with substantial implications;

(ii) common agricultural and common fisheries policies; [[note: 1]]OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43.

(iii) the environment, security and safety or protection of the health or safety of humans, animals or plants;

(iv) the common commercial policy;

(v) taxation.

  • 3. 
    The advisory procedure applies, as a general rule, for the adoption of implementing acts not falling within the ambit of paragraph 2, but it may also apply, in duly justified cases, for the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in that paragraph.

Article 3 Common provisions 1. Where a basic act provides for the application of the procedures referred to in Articles 4 to 8, paragraphs 2 to 7 of this Article shall apply.

  • 2. 
    The Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of representatives of Member States. The committee shall be chaired by a representative of the Commission. The Chair shall not take part in the committee vote.
  • 3. 
    The Chair shall submit to the committee a draft of the acts to be adopted by the Commission.

Except in duly justified cases, he or she shall convene a meeting not less than 14 days from the submission to the committee of the draft of the acts to be adopted and of the draft agenda. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time-limit which the Chair may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. Time-limits shall be proportionate and shall afford representatives of the Member States early and effective opportunities to examine the draft acts and express their views.

  • 4. 
    Until the committee delivers an opinion, any committee member may suggest amendments and the Chair may present amended versions of the draft acts.

The Chair shall endeavour to find solutions which command the widest possible support within the committee. He or she shall inform the committee of the manner in which the discussions and suggestions for amendments have been taken into account, in particular as regards those suggestions which are largely supported within the committee.

  • 5. 
    In duly justified cases, the Chair may obtain the committee's opinion by written procedure.

He or she shall send the committee members the draft acts and shall lay down a time-limit according to the urgency of the matter. Any committee member who does not explicitly oppose or abstain before the expiry of that time-limit shall be considered to have given his or her tacit agreement to the draft acts.

Unless otherwise provided in the basic act, the written procedure shall be terminated without result where, within the time-limit referred to in the first subparagraph, the Chair so decides or a committee member so requests. In such a case, the Chair shall convene a committee meeting within a reasonable time.

  • 6. 
    The committee's opinion shall be recorded in the minutes. Each member of the committee shall have the right to ask to have his or her position recorded in the minutes. The Commission shall send the minutes to the committee members without delay.
  • 7. 
    Where applicable, the control mechanism shall include referral to an appeal committee.

The appeal committee shall adopt its own rules of procedure by simple majority of its component members, on a proposal from the Commission.

Where the appeal committee is seised, it shall meet at the earliest 14 days, except in duly justified cases, and at the latest six weeks, after the date of referral. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, the appeal committee shall deliver its opinion within two months from the date of referral.

A representative of the Commission shall chair the meetings of the appeal committee.

The Chair shall set the date of the appeal committee meeting in close cooperation with the members of the committee, in order to enable Member States and the Commission to ensure an appropriate level of representation. The Commission shall convene the first meeting of the appeal committee within one month after the entry into force of this Regulation in order to adopt its rules of procedure.

Article 4 Advisory procedure

  • 1. 
    Where the advisory procedure applies, the committee shall deliver its opinion, if necessary by taking a vote. If the committee takes a vote, the opinion shall be delivered by a simple majority of its component members.
  • 2. 
    The Commission shall decide on the acts to be adopted, taking the utmost account of the conclusions drawn from the discussions within the committee and of the opinion delivered.

Article 5 Examination procedure 1. Where the examination procedure applies, the committee shall deliver its opinion by the majority laid down in Article 16(4) and (5) of the Treaty on European Union and, where applicable, Article 238(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, for acts to be adopted on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in those Articles.

  • 2. 
    If the committee delivers a positive opinion, the Commission shall adopt the draft acts.
  • 3. 
    Without prejudice to Article 7, if the committee delivers a negative opinion, the Commission shall not adopt those acts. Where implementing acts are deemed to be necessary, the Chair may either submit the draft acts within one month to the appeal committee for further deliberation or submit to the committee within two months an amended version of the draft acts.
  • 4. 
    If no opinion is delivered, the Commission may adopt the draft acts, except in the cases provided for in the second subparagraph. Where the Commission does not adopt the draft acts, the Chair may submit to the committee an amended version of the draft acts.

Without prejudice to Article 7, the Commission shall not adopt the draft acts where:

the acts concern taxation, financial services, the protection of the health or safety of humans, animals or plants, or definitive multilateral safeguard measures, or

the basic act so provides, or

a simple majority of the component members of the committee opposes them.

In any of the cases referred to in the second subparagraph, where implementing acts are deemed to be necessary, the Chair may either submit the draft acts within one month to the appeal committee for further deliberation or submit to the committee within two months an amended version of the draft acts.

  • 5. 
    By way of derogation from paragraph 4, the following procedure shall apply for the adoption of definitive antidumping or countervailing measures, in cases where no opinion is delivered within the committee and a simple majority of its component members opposes the draft act.

The Commission shall conduct consultations with the Member States. Fourteen days at the earliest and one month at the latest after the meeting of the committee, the Commission shall inform the committee members of the results of those consultations and submit a draft act to the appeal committee. By way of derogation from Article 3(7), the appeal committee shall meet 14 days at the earliest and one month at the latest after the submission of the draft act. The appeal committee shall deliver its opinion in accordance with Article 6. The time-limits laid down in this paragraph are without prejudice to the need to ensure that the deadlines laid down in the relevant basic acts are respected.

Article 6 Referral to the appeal committee

  • 1. 
    The appeal committee shall deliver its opinion by the majority provided for in Article 5(1).
  • 2. 
    Until an opinion is delivered, any member of the appeal committee may suggest amendments to the draft acts. The Commission may adapt the draft acts.

The Chair shall endeavour to find solutions which command the widest possible support.

The Chair shall inform the appeal committee of the manner in which the discussions and suggestions for amendments have been taken into account, in particular as regards suggestions for amendments which are largely supported within the appeal committee.

  • 3. 
    If the appeal committee delivers a positive opinion, the Commission shall adopt the draft acts.

If no opinion is delivered, the Commission may adopt the draft acts.

If the appeal committee delivers a negative opinion, the Commission shall not adopt the draft acts.

  • 4. 
    By way of derogation from paragraph 3, for the adoption of definitive multilateral safeguard measures, in the absence of a positive opinion voted by the majority provided for in Article 5(1), the Commission shall not adopt the draft measures.
  • 5. 
    By way of derogation from paragraph 1, for a period of 18 months after the entry into force of this Regulation the appeal committee shall deliver its opinion on definitive draft anti- dumping or countervailing measures by a simple majority of its component members.

Article 7 Adoption of acts in exceptional cases

By way of derogation from Article 5(3) and the second subparagraph of Article 5(4), the Commission may adopt the draft acts where they need to be adopted without delay in order to avoid creating a significant disruption of the markets in the area of agriculture or a risk for the financial interests of the Union within the meaning of Article 325 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

In such a case the Commission shall immediately submit the adopted acts to the appeal committee. Where the appeal committee delivers a negative opinion on the adopted acts, the Commission shall repeal those acts forthwith. Where the appeal committee delivers a positive opinion or delivers no opinion, those acts shall remain in force.

Article 8 Immediately applicable acts

  • 1. 
    By way of derogation from Articles 4 and 5, a basic act may provide that, on duly justified imperative grounds of urgency, the provisions set out in paragraphs 2 to 5 of this Article are

to apply.

  • 2. 
    The Commission shall adopt acts which shall apply immediately and shall remain in force for a period not exceeding six months unless the basic act provides otherwise.
  • 3. 
    At the latest 14 days after their adoption, the Chair shall submit the acts referred to in paragraph 2 to the relevant committee in order to obtain its opinion .
  • 4. 
    In the case of the examination procedure, where the committee delivers a negative opinion, the Commission shall immediately repeal the acts adopted in accordance with paragraph 2.
  • 5. 
    Where the Commission adopts provisional anti-dumping or countervailing measures, the procedure provided for in this Article shall apply. The Commission shall take provisional action after consulting or, in cases of extreme urgency, after informing the Member States.

In this case, consultations shall take place ten days, at the latest, after notification to the Member States of the action taken by the Commission.

Article 9 Rules of procedure 1. Each committee shall adopt by a majority of its component members its own rules of procedure on the proposal of its Chair, on the basis of standard rules which shall be drawn up by the Commission after consultation with Member States. Such standard rules shall be published by the Commission in the Official Journal of the European Union.

In so far as may be necessary, existing committees shall adapt their rules of procedure to the standard rules.

  • 2. 
    The principles and conditions on public access to documents and the rules on data protection applicable to the Commission shall apply to the committees.

Article 10 Information on committee proceedings 1. The Commission shall keep a register of committee proceedings which shall contain:

(a) a list of committees, (b) the agendas of committee meetings, (c) the summary records, together with the lists of the authorities and organisations to which the persons designated by the Member States to represent them belong, (d) the draft acts on which the committees are asked to deliver an opinion,

(e) the voting results , (f) the final draft acts following the opinion of the committees, (g) information concerning the final adoption of the acts by the Commission, and (h) statistical data on the work of the committees.

  • 2. 
    The Commission shall also publish an annual report on the work of the committees.
  • 3. 
    The European Parliament and the Council shall have access to the information referred to in paragraph 1 in accordance with the applicable rules.
  • 4. 
    At the same time as they are sent to the committee members, the Commission shall make available to the European Parliament and the Council the documents referred to in points (b), (d) and (f) of paragraph 1 whilst also informing them of the availability of such

documents.

  • 5. 
    The references of all documents referred to in points (a) to (g) of paragraph 1 as well as the information referred to in point (h) of paragraph 1 shall be made public in the register.

Article 11 Right of scrutiny for the European Parliament and the Council

Where a basic act is adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure, either the European Parliament or the Council may at any time indicate to the Commission that, in its view, a draft implementing act exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic act. In such a case, the Commission shall review the draft act in question, taking account of the positions expressed, and shall inform the European Parliament and the Council whether it intends to maintain, amend or withdraw the draft implementing act.

Article 12 Repeal of Decision 1999/468/EC Decision 1999/468/EC is hereby repealed.

The effects of Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be maintained for the purposes of existing basic acts making reference thereto.

Article 13 Transitional provisions: adaptation of existing basic acts

  • 1. 
    Where basic acts adopted before the entry into force of this Regulation provide for the exercise of implementing powers by the Commission in accordance with Decision 1999/468/EC, the following rules shall apply:

(a) where the basic act makes reference to Article 3 of Decision 1999/468/EC, the advisory procedure referred to in Article 4 of this Regulation shall apply;

(b) where the basic act makes reference to Articles 4 and 5 of Decision 1999/468/EC, the examination procedure referred to in Article 5 of this Regulation shall apply;

(c) where the basic act makes reference to Article 4 of Decision 1999/468/EC, the second and third subparagraphs of Article 5(4) of this Regulation shall not apply;

(d) where the basic act makes reference to Article 5 of Decision 1999/468/EC, that basic act shall be considered to be the basic act within the meaning of the second subparagraph, second indent of Article 5(4) of this Regulation;

(e) where the basic act makes reference to Article 6 of Decision 1999/468/EC, Article 8 of this Regulation shall apply;

(f) where the basic act makes reference to Articles 7 and 8 of Decision 1999/468/EC, Articles 10 and 11 of this Regulation shall apply.

  • 2. 
    Articles 3 and 9 of this Regulation shall apply to all existing committees for the purposes of paragraph 1.
  • 3. 
    Article 7 of this Regulation shall apply only to existing procedures which make reference to Article 4 of Decision 1999/468/EC.
  • 4. 
    The transitional provisions laid down in this Article shall not prejudge the nature of the acts concerned.

Article 14 Transitional arrangement

This Regulation shall not affect pending procedures in which a committee has already delivered its opinion in accordance with Decision 1999/468/EC.

Article 15 Review clause

No later than five years after the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of this Regulation, accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate legislative proposals.

Article 16 Entry into force This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 March 2011.

This Regulation is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at , For the European Parliament For the Council The President The President

Annex

JOINT STATEMENT BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION

Article 5(2) of this Regulation requires the Commission to adopt a draft implementing act where the committee delivers a positive opinion. This provision does not preclude that the Commission may, as is the current practice, in very exceptional cases, take into consideration new circumstances that have arisen after the vote and decide not to adopt a draft implementing act, after having duly informed the committee and the legislator.

STATEMENTS BY THE COMMISSION

-- I -- The Commission will proceed to an examination of all legislative acts in force which were not adapted to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, in order to assess if those instruments need to be adapted to the regime of delegated acts introduced by Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The Commission will make the appropriate proposals as soon as possible and no later than at the dates mentioned in the indicative calendar annexed to this declaration.

While this alignment exercise is underway, the Commission will keep the European Parliament regularly informed on draft implementing measures related to these instruments which should become, in the future, delegated acts.

As regards legislative acts in force which currently contain references to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, the Commission will review the provisions attached to this procedure in each instrument it intends to modify, in order to adapt them in due course according to the criteria laid down in the Treaty. In addition, the European Parliament and the Council will be entitled to signal basic acts they consider important to adapt as a matter of priority.

The Commission will assess the results of this process by the end of 2012 in order to estimate how many legislative acts containing references to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny remain in force. The Commission will then prepare the appropriate legislative initiatives to complete the adaptation. The overall objective of the Commission is that, by the end of the 7

th term of the Parliament, all provisions referring to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny would have been removed from all legislative instruments.

-- II -- The Commission notes that it has recently launched a study which will provide a complete and objective review of all aspects of the EU's trade defence policy and practice, including an evaluation of the performance, methods, utilisation and effectiveness of the present TDI scheme in achieving its trade policy objectives, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the existing and potential policy decisions of the European Union (e.g., the Union interest test, the lesser duty rule, the duty collection system) in comparison with the policy decisions made by certain trading partners and an

examination of the basic anti-dumping and anti-subsidy regulations in light of the administrative practice of the EU institutions, the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the recommendations and rulings of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body.

The Commission intends, in the light of the results of the study and of developments in the Doha Development Agenda negotiations to explore whether and how to further update and modernize the EU's trade defence instruments The Commission also recalls the recent initiatives it has taken to improve the transparency of the operation of trade defence instruments (such as the appointment of a Hearing Officer) and its work with Member States to clarify key elements of trade defence practice. The Commission attaches substantial importance to this work, and will seek to identify, in consultation with the Member States, other initiatives which could be taken in this respect.

-- III -- Under the comitology rules based on Council Decision 1999/468/EC, where a Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) management committee has delivered an unfavourable opinion, the Commission must submit the draft measure in question to the Council which may take a different decision within a month. However, the Commission is not barred from acting but has the choice to either put the measure in place or defer its application. Hence, the Commission may take the measure where it considers on balance that suspending its application would for instance provoke irreversible negative market effects. When afterwards the Council decides otherwise the measure put in effect by the Commission becomes of course redundant. Thus the current rules equip the Commission with an instrument that allows protecting the common interest of the whole Union by adopting a measure at least on an interim basis.

Article 5b of this Regulation pursues the objective to maintain this approach within the new comitology arrangements but limited to exceptional situations and on the basis of clearly defined and restrictive criteria. It would allow the Commission to adopt a draft measure despite the unfavourable opinion of the examination committee provided that its "non adoption within an imperative deadline would create a significant disruption of the markets (...) or for the financial interests of the Union." The provision refers to situations where it is not possible to wait until the committee votes again on the same or another draft measure because in the meantime the market would be significantly disrupted e.g. due to the speculative behaviour of operators. To ensure the Union's ability to act it would give Member States and the Commission the opportunity to have another informed discussion on the draft measure without leaving things undecided and open to speculation with the negative consequences for the markets and the budget.

Such situations may namely arise in the context of the day-to-day management of the CAP (e.g.

fixing of export refunds, management of licences, special safeguard clause) where decisions need often to be taken quickly and can have significant economic consequences for the markets and thus farmers and operators but also for the budget of the Union.

-- IV --

In cases where the European Parliament or the Council indicate to the Commission that they consider a draft implementing act to exceed the implementing powers provided for in the basic act, the Commission will immediately review the draft implementing act taking into account the positions expressed by the European Parliament or the Council.

The Commission will act in a manner which takes duly into account the urgency of the matter.

Before deciding whether the draft implementing act shall be adopted, amended or withdrawn, the Commission will inform the European Parliament or the Council of the action it intends to take and of its reasons for doing so.

Appendix ANNEX to statement I by the Commission Indicative table of basic acts not under co-decision procedure before the Treaty of Lisbon which need to be adapted to take into account Article 290 of TFEU Policy Domain Acts to be Reviewed Indicative timing Limited to Included alignment in broader proposal ESTAT 1. Regulation (EC) No 1365/2006 of the European Parliament and of the 2011, 4

th quarter X Council of 6 September 2006 on statistics of goods transport by inland waterways and repealing Council Directive 80/1119/EEC*[[note: 1]]SANCO 2. Council Directive 64/432/EEC on animal health problems affecting intra-March 2012 X Community trade in bovine animals and swine*[[note: 2]]

  • 3. 
    Council Directive 90/426/EEC on animal health conditions governing the March 2012 X movement and import from third countries of equidae *[[note: 2]]
  • 4. 
    Council Directive 91/68/EEC on animal health conditions governing intra-March 2012 X Community trade in ovine and caprine animals*[[note: 2]]
  • 5. 
    Council Directive 2004/68/EC laying down animal health rules for the March 2012 X importation into and transit through the Community of certain live ungulate animals, amending Directives 90/426/EEC and 92/65/EEC and repealing [[note: 1]] The level of amendments depends on the outcome of the meeting with the MS planned for December 2010. Note that this regulation was adopted under co-decision procedure. [[note: 2]] As part of a package containing inter alia a proposal for an EU Animal Health Law and a proposal to review Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on official controls.

18097/10 JDC/cc 22 DQPG

EN

Directive 72/462/EEC*[[note: 2]]

  • 6. 
    Council Directive 2009/158/EC on animal health conditions governing intra-March 2012 X Community trade in and imports from third countries of poultry and hatching eggs*[[note: 2]]
  • 7. 
    Council Directive 92/65/EEC laying down animal health requirements March 2012 X governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A(I) to Directive 90/425/EEC*[[note: 2]]
  • 8. 
    Council Directive 88/407/EEC laying down the animal health requirements March 2012 X applicable to intra-Community trade in and imports of semen of domestic animals of the bovine species*[[note: 2]]
  • 9. 
    Council Directive 89/556/EEC on animal health conditions governing intra-March 2012 X Community trade in and importation from third countries of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species*[[note: 2]]
  • 10. 
    Council Directive 90/429/EEC laying down the animal health requirements March 2012 X applicable to intra-Community trade in and imports of semen of domestic animals of porcine species*[[note: 2]]
  • 11. 
    Council Directive 2002/99/EC laying down the animal health rules March 2012 X governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption (imports only) *[[note: 2]]
  • 12. 
    Council Directive 92/118/EEC laying down animal health and public health March 2012 X requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, to Directive 90/425/EEC*[[note: 2]]
  • 13. 
    Directive 2006/88/EC on animal health requirements for aquaculture animals March 2012 X and products thereof, and on the prevention and control of certain diseases in aquatic animals. *[[note: 2]]
  • 14. 
    Council Directive 92/35/EEC laying down control rules and measures to March 2012 X combat African horse sickness*[[note: 2]]

18097/10 JDC/cc 23 DQPG

EN

  • 15. 
    Council Directive 77/391/EEC introducing community measures for the March 2012 X eradication of brucellosis, tuberculosis and leucosis in cattle*[[note: 2]]
  • 16. 
    Council Directive 82/400/EEC amending Directive 77/391/EEC and March 2012 X introducing a supplementary Community measure for the eradication of brucellosis, tuberculosis and leucosis in cattle*[[note: 2]]
  • 17. 
    Council Decision 90/242/EEC introducing a community financial measure March 2012 X for the eradication of brucellosis in sheep and goats*[[note: 2]]
  • 18. 
    Council Directive 90/423/EEC of 26 June 1990 amending Directive March 2012 X 85/511/EEC introducing Community measures for the control of foot-and- mouth disease, Directive 64/432/EEC on animal health problems Affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine and Directive 72/462/EEC on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine animals and swine and fresh meat or meat products from third countries*[[note: 2]]
  • 19. 
    Council Directive 2003/85/EC on Community measures for the control of March 2012 X foot-and-mouth disease repealing Directive 85/511/EEC and Decisions 89/531/EEC and 91/665/EEC and amending Directive 92/46/EEC*[[note: 2]]
  • 20. 
    Council Directive 2005/94/EC on Community measures for the control of March 2012 X avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC*[[note: 2]]
  • 21. 
    Council Directive 92/66/EEC introducing Community measures for the March 2012 X control of Newcastle disease*[[note: 2]]
  • 22. 
    Council Directive 80/1095/EEC laying down conditions designed to render March 2012 X and keep the territory of the Community free from classical swine fever*[[note: 2]]
  • 23. 
    Council Decision 80/1096/EEC introducing Community financial measures March 2012 X for the eradication of classical swine fever*[[note: 2]]
  • 24. 
    Council Directive 92/119/EEC introducing general Community measures for March 2012 X the control of certain animal diseases and specific measures relating to swine vesicular disease*[[note: 2]]
  • 25. 
    Council Directive 2001/89/EC on Community measures for the control of March 2012 X classical swine fever*[[note: 2]]
  • 26. 
    Council Decision 79/511/EEC on a financial contribution from the 2011/2012 X Community to the campaign against foot-and-mouth disease in south-east

18097/10 JDC/cc 24 DQPG

EN

Europe*[[note: 2]]

18097/10 JDC/cc 25 DQPG

EN

18097/10 JDC/cc 26 DQPG

EN

18097/10 JDC/cc 27 DQPG

EN

(footnote on previous page)

  • 71. 
    Council Directive 87/357/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the 2011 second semester X Member States concerning products which, appearing to be other than they are, endanger the health or safety of consumers MARKT 72. COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the 2011[[note: 2]]X Community trade mark TRADE 73. Council Regulation (EEC) no. 3030/93 on common rules for imports of End of 2010 / early X certain textile products from third countries 2011 74. Council Regulation (EC) no 517/94 on common rules for imports of textile End of 2010 / early X products from certain third countries not covered by bilateral agreements, 2011 protocols or other arrangements, or by other specific Community import rules 75. Council Regulation (EC) No 2248/2001 of 19 November 2001 on certain End of 2010 / early X procedures for applying the Stabilisation and Association Agreement 2011 between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Croatia, of the other part and for applying the Interim Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Croatia, as amended [[note: 1]] Related to the ongoing review of the EU Plant Health Law - not decided if revision would be limited to alignment only [[note: 2]] Due to the political complexity of the issue, the date cannot be further specified

18097/10 JDC/cc 28 DQPG

EN

  • 76. 
    Council Regulation (EC) No. 953/2003 to avoid trade diversion into the End of 2010 / early X European Union of certain key medicines 2011 [Council Regulation (EC) no. 868/2004 concerning protection against subsidisation and unfair pricing practices causing injury to Community air carriers in the supply of air services from countries not members of the European Community deleted][[note: 1]]
  • 77. 
    Council Regulation (EC) No. 673/2005 establishing additional customs End of 2010 / early X duties on imports of certain products originating in the United States of 2011 America 78. Council Regulation (EC) No 1616/2006 of 23 October 2006 on certain End of 2010 / early X procedures for applying the Stabilisation and Association Agreement 2011 between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Albania, of the other part, and for applying the Interim Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Albania 79. Council Regulation (EC) no 1528/2007 applying the arrangements for End of 2010 / early X products originating in certain states which are part of the African, Caribbean 2011 and Pacific (ACP) Group of States provided for in agreements establishing, or leading to the establishment of, Economic Partnership Agreements 80. Council Regulation (EC) No 55/2008 of 21 January 2008 introducing End of 2010 / early X autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Moldova and amending 2011 Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 and Commission Decision 2005/924/EC 81. Council Regulation (EC) No 140/2008 of 19 November 2007 on certain End of 2010 / early X procedures for applying the Stabilisation and Association Agreement 2011 between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Montenegro, of the other part, and for applying the Interim Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Montenegro, of the other part [[note: 1]] This regulation was erroneously in the original list as it had already been under co-decision before the Lisbon Treaty and was included in the PRAC alignment

18097/10 JDC/cc 29 DQPG

EN

18097/10 JDC/cc 30 DQPG

EN

nd half of 2011 X scheme for imports of timber into the European Community ENER 100. Council Regulation (EC) No 733/2008 of 15 July 2008 on the conditions no date foreseen before X governing imports of agricultural products originating in third countries 2013[[note: 3]]

following the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power station (Codified version)

Council Regulation (EC) No 1048/2009 of 23 October 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 733/2008 on the conditions governing imports of agricultural products originating in third countries following the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power station[[note: 2]]CLIMA 101. 2002/358/EC: Council Decision of 25 April 2002 concerning the approval, -[[note: 4]]X on behalf of the European Community, of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the joint fulfilment of commitments thereunder

*[[note: 1]] Will be repealed by Regulation No 1224/2009, no specific modification is needed [[note: 2]] The legal assessment whether these regulations concern Art. 290 or Art. 291 TFEU is in progress [[note: 3]] The assessment whether the conditions of Art. 290 TFEU are fulfilled is in progress. [[note: 4]] Council Decision concluding the Kyoto Protocol on behalf of the Community and it will not be revised or otherwise amended. It called for only one implementing measure to be adopted, Decision 2006/944/EC as mentioned in the next row.

18097/10 JDC/cc 31 DQPG

EN

th quarter 2010 X the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products (codified version of the 3448/1993 Regulation). AGRI 104. Règlement (CE) n° 247/2006 du Conseil, du 30 janvier 2006, portant 23/09/2010 X mesures spécifiques dans le domaine de l'agriculture en faveur des régions ultrapériphériques de l'Union.

  • 105. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 1698/2005 du Conseil, du 20 septembre 2005, 30/09/2010 X concernant le soutien au développement rural par le Fonds européen agricole pour le développement rural (Feader).
  • 106. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 73/2009 du Conseil, du 19 janvier 2009, établissant des 30/09/2010 X règles communes pour les régimes de soutien direct en faveur des agriculteurs dans le cadre de la politique agricole commune et établissant certains régimes de soutien en faveur des agriculteurs, modifiant les règlements [...] 107. Règlement (CEE) n° 1601/91 du Conseil, du 10 juin 1991, établissant les 1

st quarter 2011 X règles générales relatives à la définition, à la désignation et à la présentation des vins aromatisés, des boissons aromatisées à base de vin et des cocktails aromatisés de produits viti-vinicoles.

  • 108. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 1290/2005 du Conseil, du 21 juin 2005, relatif au 4th quarter 2010 X financement de la politique agricole commune.
  • 109. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 378/2007 du Conseil, du 27 mars 2007, fixant les règles 4th quarter of 2010 X applicables à la modulation facultative des paiement directs prévus par le règlement (CE) n° 1782/2003 établissant des règles communes pour les régimes de soutien direct dans le cadre de la politique agricole commune et établissant certains régimes de soutien en faveur des agriculteurs, et

18097/10 JDC/cc 32 DQPG

EN

modifiant le règlement (CE) n° 1290/2005.

  • 110. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 834/2007 du Conseil, du 28 juin 2007, relatif à la 4th quarter 2010 X production biologique et à l'étiquetage des produits biologiques et abrogeant le règlement (CEE) n° 2092/91.
  • 111. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 165/94 du Conseil, du 24 janvier 1994, concernant le Will be repealed by X cofinancement par la Communauté des contrôles par télédétection, et "Alignment of modifiant le règlement (CEE) n° 3508/92 établissant un système intégré de Rgt.1290/2005"

gestion et de contrôle relatif à certains régimes d'aides communautaires.

  • 112. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 509/2006 du Conseil, du 20 mars 2006, relatif aux 4th quarter 2010 X spécialités traditionnelles garanties des produits agricoles et des denrées alimentaires.
  • 113. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 510/2006 du Conseil, du 20 mars 2006, relatif à la 4th quarter 2010 X protection des indications géographiques et des appellations d'origine des produits agricoles et des denrées alimentaires.
  • 114. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 1405/2006 du Conseil, du 18 septembre 2006, arrêtant 4th quarter 2010 X des mesures spécifiques dans le domaine de l'agriculture en faveur des îles mineures de la mer Égée et modifiant le règlement (CE) n° 1782/2003.
  • 115. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 1234/2007 du Conseil, du 22 octobre 2007, portant 4th quarter 2010 X organisation commune des marchés dans le secteur agricole et dispositions spécifiques en ce qui concerne certains produits de ce secteur (règlement «OCM unique»).
  • 116. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 110/2008 du Parlement européen et du Conseil, du 15 4th quarter 2011 (ex-X janvier 2008, concernant la définition, la désignation, la présentation, PRAC)

l'étiquetage et la protection des indications géographiques des boissons spiritueuses et abrogeant le règlement (CEE) n° 1576/89 du Conseil.

  • 117. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 485/2008 du Conseil, du 26 mai 2008, relatif aux 4th quarter of 2010 X contrôles, par les États membres, des opérations faisant partie du système de financement par le Fonds européen agricole de garantie (version codifiée).
  • 118. 
    Règlement (CEE) n° 922/72 du Conseil, du 2 mai 1972, fixant, pour la Will be repealed by X campagne d'élevage 1972/1973, les règles générales d'octroi de l'aide pour "New single CMO"

les vers à soie.

18097/10 JDC/cc 33 DQPG

EN

  • 119. 
    Règlement (CEE) n° 352/78 du Conseil, du 20 février 1978, concernant mid-2011 - PAC post X l'attribution des cautions, cautionnements ou garanties constitués dans le 2013 cadre de la politique agricole commune et restant acquis.
  • 120. 
    Règlement (CE) nº 814/2000 du Conseil, du 17 avril 2000, relatif aux actions mid-2011 X d'information dans le domaine de la politique agricole commune.
  • 121. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 320/2006 du Conseil, du 20 février 2006, instituant un mid-2011 - PAC post X régime temporaire de restructuration de l'industrie sucrière dans la 2013 Communauté européenne et modifiant le règlement (CE) n° 1290/2005 relatif au financement de la politique agricole commune.
  • 122. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 1667/2006 du Conseil, du 7 novembre 2006, relatif au mid-2011 X glucose et au lactose (version codifiée).
  • 123. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 3/2008 du Conseil, du 17 décembre 2007, relatif à des mid-2011 X actions d'information et de promotion en faveur des produits agricoles sur le marché intérieur et dans les pays tiers.
  • 124. 
    Règlement (CE) nº 637/2008 du Conseil du 23 juin 2008 modifiant le mid-2011 - PAC post X règlement (CE) nº 1782/2003 et instaurant des programmes nationaux de 2013 restructuration du secteur du coton 125. Règlement (CE) n° 614/2009 du Conseil, du 7 juillet 2009, concernant le mid-2011 X régime commun d'échanges pour l'ovalbumine et la lactalbumine (version codifiée).
  • 126. 
    Directive 2001/112/CE du Conseil, du 20 décembre 2001, relative aux jus de September 2010 X fruits et à certains produits similaires destinés à l'alimentation humaine.
  • 127. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 78/2008 du Conseil, du 21 janvier 2008, portant sur les actions à entreprendre par la Commission, pour la période 2008-2013, par l'intermédiaire des applications de télédétection mises en place dans le cadre de la politique agricole commune. Will be repealed by X "Alignment of Reg.

1290/2005"

  • 128. 
    Règlement (CE) n o 1217/2009 du Conseil du 30 novembre 2009 portant 4th quarter 2011 X création d'un réseau d'information comptable agricole sur les revenus et l'économie des exploitations agricoles dans la Communauté européenne 129. Règlement (CEE) n° 706/73 du Conseil, du 12 mars 1973, relatif à la 4th quarter 2011 X réglementation communautaire applicable aux îles anglo-normandes et à l'île de Man en ce qui concerne les échanges de produits agricoles.

18097/10 JDC/cc 34 DQPG

EN

  • 130. 
    Règlement (CE) nº 2799/98 du Conseil, du 15 décembre 1998, établissant le 4th quarter 2011 - PAC X régime agrimonétaire de l'euro. post 2013 131. Directive 1999/4/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil, du 22 février 4th quarter 2011 (ex-X 1999, relative aux extraits de café et aux extraits de chicorée. PRAC)
  • 132. 
    Directive 2000/36/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil, du 23 juin 2000, 4th quarter 2011 (ex-X relative aux produits de cacao et de chocolat destinés à l'alimentation PRAC)

humaine.

  • 133. 
    Directive 2001/110/CE du Conseil, du 20 décembre 2001, relative au miel. 4th quarter 2011 X 134. Directive 2001/113/CE du Conseil, du 20 décembre 2001, relative aux 4th quarter 2011 X confitures, gelées et marmelades de fruits, ainsi qu'à la crème de marrons, destinées à l'alimentation humaine.
  • 135. 
    Directive 2001/114/CE du Conseil, du 20 décembre 2001, relative à certains 4th quarter 2011 X laits de conserve partiellement ou totalement déshydratés destinés à l'alimentation humaine.
  • 136. 
    Directive 2001/111/CE du Conseil, du 20 décembre 2001, relative à certains 4th quarter 2011 X sucres destinés à l'alimentation humaine.
  • 137. 
    Règlement (CEE) n° 451/89 du Conseil, du 20 février 1989, concernant la 4th quarter 2011 X procédure à appliquer à certains produits agricoles originaires de divers pays tiers méditerranéens.
  • 138. 
    Règlement (CEE) n° 3491/90 du Conseil, du 26 novembre 1990, relatif aux 4th quarter 2011 X importations de riz originaires du Bangladesh.
  • 139. 
    Règlement (CEE) n°478/92 du Conseil, du 25 février 1992, portant ouverture 4th quarter 2011 may X d'un contingent tarifaire communautaire annuel pour les aliments pour chiens be obsolete - to be ou chats, conditionnés pour la vente de détail, relevant du code NC 2309 10 confirmed 11 et d'un contingent tarifaire communautaire annuel pour les aliments pour poissons relevant du code NC ex 2309 90 41,originaires et en provenance des îles Féroé.
  • 140. 
    Règlement (CEE) n° 3125/92 du Conseil, du 26 octobre 1992, relatif au 4th quarter 2011 may X régime applicable à l'importation dans la Communauté des produits du be obsolete - to be secteur des viandes ovine et caprine originaires de Bosnie-Herzégovine, de confirmed Croatie, de Slovénie, du Monténégro, de Serbie et de l'ancienne république yougoslave de Macédoine.

18097/10 JDC/cc 35 DQPG

EN

  • 141. 
    Règlement (CEE) n° 1108/93 du Conseil, du 4 mai 1993, relatif à certaines 4th quarter 2011 X modalités d'application des accords bilatéraux agricoles conclus entre la Communauté, d'une part, et l'Autriche, la Finlande, l'Islande, la Norvège et la Suède, d'autre part.
  • 142. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 774/94 du Conseil, du 29 mars 1994, portant ouverture et 4th quarter 2011 X mode de gestion de certains contingents tarifaires communautaires pour la viande bovine de haute qualité, la viande porcine, la viande de volaille, le froment (blé) et méteil et les sons, remoulages et autres résidus.
  • 143. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 2184/96 du Conseil, du 28 octobre 1996, relatif aux 4th quarter 2011 may X importations dans la Communauté de riz originaire et en provenance be obsolete - to be d'Égypte. confirmed 144. Règlement (CE) n° 2398/96 du Conseil, du 12 décembre 1996, portant 4th quarter 2011 - - X ouverture d'un contingent tarifaire de viande de dinde originaire et en may be obsolete - to be provenance d'Israël prévu par l'accord d'association et l'accord intérimaire confirmed entre la Communauté européenne et l'État d'Israël.
  • 145. 
    Règlement (CE) nº 2005/97 du Conseil, du 9 octobre 1997, prévoyant 4th quarter 2011 X certaines règles d'application pour le régime spécial aux importations d'huile d'olive originaire d'Algérie.
  • 146. 
    Règlement (CE) nº 2007/97 du Conseil, du 9 octobre 1997, prévoyant 4th quarter 2011 X certaines règles d'application pour le régime spécial aux importations d'huile d'olive originaire du Liban.
  • 147. 
    Règlement (CE) nº 779/98 du Conseil, du 7 avril 1998, relatif à l'importation 4th quarter 2011 X dans la Communauté de produits agricoles originaires de Turquie, abrogeant le règlement (CEE) nº 4115/86 et modifiant le règlement (CE) nº 3010/95.
  • 148. 
    Règlement (CE) nº 1506/98 du Conseil, du 13 juillet 1998, établissant une 4th quarter 2011 may X concession, en faveur de la Turquie, sous forme d'un contingent tarifaire be obsolete - to be communautaire en 1998 pour les noisettes et suspendant certaines confirmed concessions.
  • 149. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 1722/1999 du Conseil, du 29 juillet 1999, concernant 4th quarter 2011 may X l'importation de sons, remoulages et autres résidus du criblage, de la mouture be obsolete - to be ou autres traitements des grains de certaines céréales, originaires d'Algérie, confirmed du Maroc et d'Égypte, ainsi que l'importation de froment (blé) dur, originaire

du Maroc.

18097/10 JDC/cc 36 DQPG

EN

  • 150. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 1149/2002 du Conseil, du 27 juin 2002, ouvrant un 4th quarter 2011 X contingent autonome pour les importations de viande bovine de haute qualité.
  • 151. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 1532/2006 du Conseil, du 12 octobre 2006, sur les 4th quarter 2011 X conditions relatives à certains contingents d'importation de viande bovine de haute qualité.
  • 152. 
    Règlement (CE) n° 617/2009 du Conseil, du 13 juillet 2009, relatif à 4th quarter 2011 X l'ouverture d'un contingent tarifaire autonome pour les importations de viande bovine de haute qualité. HOME 153. Council Directive 2003/110 of 25 November 2003 on assistance in cases of 2012, 2

nd half X transit for the purposes of removal by air

18097/10 JDC/cc 37 DQPG

EN

2.

Originele weergave

afbeelding document
 
 

3.

Meer informatie